SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents5 mM N-terminal domain of Yeast Calmodulin; 50 mM KCl; 15 mM CaCl2; 90% H2O, 10% D2O
Solvent90% H2O, 10% D2O
Ionic Strength50mM KCl
pH6.8
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)303
Experiment(s):2D NOESY, DQF-COSY, 2D TOCSY
Sample Contents3 mM N-terminal domain of Yeast Calmodulin U-15N; 50 mM KCl; 9 mM CaCl2; 90% H2O, 10% D2O
Solvent90% H2O, 10% D2O
Ionic Strength50mM KCl
pH6.8
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)303
Experiment(s):3D_15N-separated_NOESY, 3D_15N-separated_TOCSY, 15N-HSQC
Sample Contents3 mM N-terminal domain of Yeast Calmodulin; 50 mM KCl; 9 mM CaCl2; 99.99% D2O
Solvent99.99% D2O
Ionic Strength50mM KCl
pH6.8
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)303
Experiment(s):2D NOESY
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
JEOL A 600.0
JEOL A 500.0
NMR Refinement
Method Simulated annealing
Details The structures are based on a total of 920 restraints, 863 are NOE-derived distance constraints, 17 dihedral angle restraints, 28 distance restraints from hydrogen bonds, 12 calcium-ligand distance restraints
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria structures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number 200
Conformers Submitted Total Number 30
Additional NMR Experimental Information
1 The structure was determined using double-resonance NMR spectroscopy on 15N-labeled protein
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 refinement X-PLOR 3.851 Brunger
2 structure solution X-PLOR 3.851 Brunger