SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents0.9mM U-15N, 13C; Hydrolase 50mM phosphate buffer, 1.5mM EDTA, 3mM DTT
Solvent90% H2O, 10% D2O
Ionic Strength50mM
pH6.5
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):CBCANH,CBCA(CO)NH,C(CO)NH_TOCSY,HNCO,(HCA)CO(CA)NH
Sample Contents0.9mM U-15N,13C; Hydrolase 50mM phosphate buffer, 1.3mM EDTA, 1.5mM EDTA,3mM DTT
Solvent100% D2O
Ionic Strength50mM
pH6.5
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):HCACO,HCCH-TOCSY,13C-NOESY-HSQC,(HB)CB(CGCD)HD,(HB)CB(CGCDCE)HE,HACAHB,13C_CT_HEQC,
Sample Contents1.2mM U-15N; Hydrolase 50mM phosphate buffer, 1.5mM EDTA, 3mM DTT
Solvent90% H2O, 10% D2O
Ionic Strength50mM
pH6.5
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):HNHB,HNHA,15N-TOCSY-HSQC,15N-NOESY-HSQC,15N-IPAP-HSQC
Sample Contents1.2mM U-15N; Hydrolase 20mM imidazole buffer, 20mM MGCl2
Solvent90% H2O, 10% D2O
Ionic Strength40mM
pH6.5
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):15N-NOESY-HSQC
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
Varian INOVA 600.0
Varian INOVA 600.0
Varian INOVA 600.0
Varian INOVA 600.0
NMR Refinement
Method torsion angle dynamics,simulated annealing
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria structures with favorable non-bond energy,structures with the least restraint violations,target function
Conformers Calculated Total Number 100
Conformers Submitted Total Number 25
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 lowest energy
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 collection VNMR 6.1 b Varian
2 refinement CNS 0.9 Brunger
3 refinement DYANA 1.5,1.4 Guentert
4 data analysis XEASY 1.3.13 Bartels
5 processing NMRPipe 1.7 Delaglio