SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents2 mM N-Ada10; 25 mM sodium phosphate buffer pH 6.4, 50 mM NaCl, and 10 mM 2-mercaptoethanol; 90% H2O, 10% D2O
Solvent90% H2O, 10% D2O
Ionic Strengthn/a
pH6.4
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):2D NOESY
Sample Contents2 mM N-Ada10; 25 mM sodium phosphate buffer pH 6.4, 50 mM NaCl, and 10 mM 2-mercaptoethanol; 100% D2O
Solvent90% H2O, 10% D2O
Ionic Strengthn/a
pH6.4
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):2D NOESY
Sample Contents2 mM N-Ada10 U-15N; 25 mM sodium phosphate buffer pH 6.4, 50 mM NaCl, and 10 mM 2-mercaptoethanol; 90% H2O, 10% D2O
Solvent100% D2O
Ionic Strengthn/a
pH6.4
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):3D_15N-separated_NOESY, HNHA
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
Varian UNITYplus 750.0
Varian UNITYplus 400.0
Varian UNITY 500.0
Varian VXRS 500.0
Bruker AMX 600.0
Bruker AMX 500.0
NMR Refinement
Method distance geometry
Details the structures are based on a total of 1014 restraints, 872 are NOE-derived distance constraints, 82 dihedral angle restraints,46 distance restraints from hydrogen bonds, and 14 zinc cluster distance restraints
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria structures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number 50
Conformers Submitted Total Number 25
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 lowest energy
Additional NMR Experimental Information
1 This structure was determined using standard 2D homonuclear and 3D heteronuclear techinques
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 refinement DGII Havel et al
2 structure solution DGII Havel et al
3 data analysis XEASY Brartels et al
4 processing FELIX 95 n/a
5 collection VNMR n/a
6 collection UXNMR n/a