SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents0.8 mM U-15N,13C Cdc42Hs, 0.8 mM PBD46; 25 mM NaCl, 5 mM Na2PO4, 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM NaN3, pH 5.5
Solvent90% H2O, 10% D2O
Ionic Strength64 mM
pH5.5
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):3D_13C-separated_NOESY
Sample Contents0.8 mM U-15N Cdc42Hs, 0.8 mM PBD46; 25 mM NaCl, 5 mM Na2PO4, 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM NaN3, pH 5.5
Solvent90% H2O, 10% D2O
Ionic Strength64 mM
pH5.5
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):3D_15N-separated_NOESY
Sample Contents0.8 mM Cdc42Hs, 0.8 mM U-15N,13C PBD46; 25 mM NaCl, 5 mM Na2PO4, 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM NaN3, pH 5.5
Solvent90% H2O, 10% D2O
Ionic Strength64 mM
pH5.5
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):3D_13C-separated_NOESY
Sample Contents0.8 mM Cdc42Hs, 0.8 mM U-15N PBD46; 25 mM NaCl, 5 mM Na2PO4, 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM NaN3, pH 5.5
Solvent90% H2O, 10% D2O
Ionic Strength64 mM
pH5.5
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):3D_15N-separated_NOESY
Sample Contents0.8 mM U-2H,15N Cdc42Hs, 0.8 mM PBD46; 25 mM NaCl, 5 mM Na2PO4, 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM NaN3, pH 5.5
Solvent90% H2O, 10% D2O
Ionic Strength64 mM
pH5.5
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):3D_15N-separated_NOESY, 2D NOESY
Sample Contents0.8 mM U-15N,13C Cdc42Hs, 0.8 mM PBD46; 25 mM NaCl, 5 mM Na2PO4, 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM NaN3, pH 5.5
Solvent100% D2O
Ionic Strength64 mM
pH5.5
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):3D_13C-separated_NOESY
Sample Contents0.8 mM Cdc42Hs, 0.8 mM U-15N,13C PBD46; 25 mM NaCl, 5 mM Na2PO4, 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM NaN3, pH 5.5
Solvent100% D2O
Ionic Strength64 mM
pH5.5
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):3D_13C-separated_NOESY
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
Varian INOVA 600.0
NMR Refinement
Method distance geometry simulated annealing Ramachandran refinement
Details Structures are based on 2412 distance and dihedral restraints
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria structures with acceptable covalent geometry,structures with favorable non-bond energy,structures with the least restraint violations,structures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number 200
Conformers Submitted Total Number 20
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 closest to the average
Additional NMR Experimental Information
1 The structure was determined using triple-resonance and double-resonance NMR spectroscopy
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 refinement X-PLOR 3.851 Brunger
2 structure solution X-PLOR 3.851 Brunger
3 data analysis XEASY 1.3.13 Wuthrich
4 processing NMRPipe 1.7 Delaglio
5 data analysis FELIX 2.3 Molecular Simulations
6 collection VNMR 5.3,6.1 Varian