SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents1.8 mM PCP; 50 mM Na-phosphate buffer pH 5.05
Solvent90% H2O, 10% D2O
Ionic Strength50 mM Na-Phosphate
pH5.05
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)300
Experiment(s):2D NOESY
Sample Contents1.8 mM PCP U-15N; 50 mM Na-phosphate buffer pH 5.05
Solvent90% H2O, 10% D2O
Ionic Strength50 mM Na-Phosphate
pH5.05
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)300
Experiment(s):3D_15N-separated_NOESY, HNHA
Sample Contents1.8 mM PCP U-15N,13C; 50 mM Na-phosphate buffer pH 5.05
Solvent100% D2O
Ionic Strength50 mM Na-Phosphate
pH5.05
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)300
Experiment(s):3D_13C-separated_NOESY
Sample Contents1.8 mM PCP; 50 mM Na-phosphate buffer pH 5.05
Solvent100% D2O
Ionic Strength50 mM Na-Phosphate
pH5.05
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)300
Experiment(s):2D NOESY
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
Bruker DMX 750.0
Bruker DRX 600.0
Bruker DRX 500.0
Bruker AMX 500.0
NMR Refinement
Method simulated annealing
Details USED DISTANCE CONSTRAINTS: 856; intra-residue: 47; sequential: 287; medium range (2<|i-j|<5): 215; long range (|i-j|>4): 253; hydrogen bonds (2 restraints per H-bond): 54;DIHEDRAL ANGLE CONSTRAINTS: 104
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria structures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number 100
Conformers Submitted Total Number 21
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 minimized average structure
Additional NMR Experimental Information
1 All spectrometers were equipped with triple resonance (1H, 13C, 15N) probeheads and pulsed-field gradient accessories. The structure was determined using triple-resonance NMR techniques. BEST REPRESENTATIVE CONFORMER 1 IN THIS ENSEMBLE is the minimized mean structure of the remaining 20 conformers.
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 structure solution X-PLOR 3.1 Brunger
2 refinement CC-NMR Cieslar