SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents4 MM CHEY U-15N, 13C, 16 MM BECL2, 100 MM NAF, 20 MM MGCL2, PH 6.7
Solventn/a
Ionic Strength16 mM BECL2, 100 mM NAF, 20 mM MGCL2
pH6.7
PressureAMBIENT
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):4D_13C-SEPARATED_NOESY, 4D_13C/15N-SEPARATED_NOESY, 13C CONSTANT-TIME HMQC-J
Sample Contents3 MM U-15N, 16 MM BECL2, 100 MM NAF, 20 MM MGCL2, PH 6.7
Solventn/a
Ionic Strength16 mM BECL2, 100 mM NAF, 20 mM MGCL2
pH6.7
PressureAMBIENT
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):3D_15N-SEPARATED_NOESY, 15N HMQC-J
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
Bruker AMX 600.0
NMR Refinement
Method torsion angle dynamics
Details THE STRUCTURES ARE BASED ON A TOTAL OF 972 NON-TRIVIAL NOE RESTRAINTS (213 INTRA RESIDUE, 271 SEQUENTIAL, 238 MEDIUM-RANGE, AND 250 LONG-RANGE). 78 PHI TORSION ANGLE RESTRAINTS AND 17 CHI1 RESTRAINTS WERE USED. 47 HYDROGEN BONDS ( 94 UPPER AND LOWER DISTANCE RESTRAINTS) WERE USED IN LATER STAGES OF REFINEMENT.
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria structures with the least restraint violations
Conformers Calculated Total Number 60
Conformers Submitted Total Number 27
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 fewest violations
Additional NMR Experimental Information
1 THE STRUCTURE WAS DETERMINED USING TRIPLE-RESONANCE NMR SPECTROSCOPY.
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 structure solution version: 1.5 DYANA GUNTERT, MUMENTHALER, WUTHRICH
2 refinement version: 2.2 OPAL LUGINBUHL, GUNTERT, BILLETER, WUTHRICH
3 processing version: 1.7 NMRPIPE DELAGLIO, BRZESIEK, VUISTER, ZHU, PFEIFER, BAX
4 processing version: 1.3.11 XEASY BARTELS, XIA, BILLETER, GUNTERT, WUTHRICH