SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents1MM U15N; 10MM PHOSPHATE BUFFER NA
Solventn/a
Ionic Strength10MM NA PHOSPHATE
pH6.8
PressureAMBIENT
Temperature (K)303
Experiment(s):3D_15N-SEPARATED_NOESY
Sample Contents1MM U15N,13C; 10MM PHOSPHATE BUFFER NA
Solventn/a
Ionic Strength10MM NA PHOSPHATE
pH6.8
PressureAMBIENT
Temperature (K)303
Experiment(s):3D_HNCA, 3D_HN(CA)HA
Sample Contents1MM U15N,13C; 10MM PHOSPHATE BUFFER NA
Solventn/a
Ionic Strength10MM NA PHOSPHATE
pH6.8
PressureAMBIENT
Temperature (K)303
Experiment(s):3D_13C-SEPARATED_NOESY, H(C)CH_TOCSY, (H)CCH_TOCSY
Sample Contents1MM 10% 13C; 10MM PHOSPHATE BUFFER NA
Solventn/a
Ionic Strength10MM NA PHOSPHATE
pH6.8
PressureAMBIENT
Temperature (K)303
Experiment(s):13C,1H_HSQC
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
BRUKER AMX 500.0
BRUKER INOVA 800.0
NMR Refinement
Method TORSION ANGLE DYNAMICS
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria STRUCTURES WITH THE LEAST RESTRAINT VIOLATIONS,TARGET FUNCTION
Conformers Calculated Total Number 50
Conformers Submitted Total Number 20
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 closest to the average,fewest violations
Additional NMR Experimental Information
1 THE STRUCTURE WAS DETERMINED USING TRIPLE-RESONANCE NMR SPECTROSCOPY.
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 data analysis XEASY 2.6 BARTELS, C.
2 refinement FANTOM 1.0 BRAUN
3 structure solution DYANA 1.5 GUENTERT,P.
4 processing PROSA 3.7 GUENTERT,P.
5 collection VNMR 2.6 VARIAN