SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents1MM PTB U-15N; 1MM NAK NA; 50MM PHOSPHATE BUFFER NA
Solventn/a
Ionic Strength50MM
pH6.00
Pressure1ATM
Temperature (K)303
Experiment(s):3D_15N-SEPARATED_NOESY
Sample Contents1MM PTB U-15N, 10% 13C; 1MM NAK NA; 50MM PHOSPHATE BUFFER NA
Solventn/a
Ionic Strength50MM
pH6.00
Pressure1ATM
Temperature (K)303
Experiment(s):2D_13C-HSQC
Sample Contents1MM PTB U-15N, U-13C; 1MM NAK NA; 50MM PHOSPHATE BUFFER NA
Solventn/a
Ionic Strength50MM
pH6.00
Pressure1ATM
Temperature (K)303
Experiment(s):3D_15N/13C-SEPARATED_NOESY, HNCO/CBCACONNH/HAHBCBCACONNH/HNCACB/CCCTOCSYCONNH/HCCTOCSYCONNH/HCCHTOCSY/HALF- FILTER-NOESY
Sample Contents1MM PTB NA; 1MM NAK (G1 F2 F7 F10) 15N, 13C;; 50MM PHOSPHATE BUFFER NA
Solventn/a
Ionic Strength50MM
pH6.00
Pressure1ATM
Temperature (K)303
Experiment(s):2D TOCSY
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
VARIAN UNITY PLUS 600.0
VARIAN UNITY PLUS 500.0
NMR Refinement
Method TORSION ANGLE DYNAMICS USING ARIA PROTOCOLS FOR AMBIGUOUS RESTRAINTS
Details THE STRUCTURES ARE BASED ON A TOTAL OF 2088 NOE, 50 DISTANCE RETRAINTS FORM HYDROGEN BONDS, 94 CHEMICAL SHIFT-DERIVED DIHEDRAL RESTRAINTS
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria STRUCTURES WITH THE LEAST RESTRAINT VIOLATIONS,STRUCTURES WITH THE LOWEST ENERGY
Conformers Calculated Total Number 150
Conformers Submitted Total Number 20
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 lowest energy
Additional NMR Experimental Information
1 THE STRUCTURE WAS DETERMINED USING TRIPLE-RESONANCE NMR SPECTROSCOPY.
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 refinement CNS 0.3 BRUNGER
2 collection VNMR 4 VARIAN INC.
3 structure solution CNS 0.3 BRUNGER
4 processing NMRPIPE 1.7 F. DELAGLIO
5 data analysis NMRVIEW 3.1 B. A. JOHNSON