SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents0.2-0.4 MM P16INK4A U-15N,13C; 4 MM HEPES, 1 MM DTT, 5 UM EDTA; 95% H2O, 5% D2O
Solventn/a
Ionic Strength0
pH7.5
PressureAMBIENT
Temperature (K)293
Experiment(s):3D_13C-SEPARATED_NOESY, 4D_13C-SEPARATED_NOESY, 4D_13C/15N-SEPARATED_NOESY
Sample Contents0.2-0.4 MM P16INK4A U-15N; 4 MM HEPES, 1 MM DTT, 5 UM EDTA; 95% H2O, 5% D2O
Solventn/a
Ionic Strength0
pH7.5
PressureAMBIENT
Temperature (K)293
Experiment(s):3D_15N-SEPARATED_NOESY, HNHA
Sample Contents0.2-0.4 MM P16INK4A; 4 MM HEPES, 1 MM DTT, 5 UM EDTA; 95% H2O, 5% D2O
Solventn/a
Ionic Strength0
pH7.5
PressureAMBIENT
Temperature (K)293
Experiment(s):2D NOESY
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
BRUKER DMX 600.0
BRUKER DRX 800.0
NMR Refinement
Method SIMULATED ANNEALING
Details THE STRUCTURES ARE BASED ON A TOTAL OF 1439 RESTRAINTS, 1372 DISTANCE RESTRAINTS, 67 TORSION ANGLE RESTRAINTS.
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria THE CLOSEST TO MEAN STRUCTURE WHICH SHOWS GOOD AGREEMENT WITH THE EXPERIMENTAL RESTRAINTS
Conformers Calculated Total Number 60
Conformers Submitted Total Number 20
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 minimized average structure
Additional NMR Experimental Information
1 THE STRUCTURE WAS DETERMINED USING TRIPLE RESONANCE NMR SPECTROSCOPY.
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 refinement X-PLOR 3.85 BRUNGER
2 processing XWINNMR 2.1 BRUKER
3 processing FELIX 95 MOLECULAR SIMULATIONS INC.
4 collection XWINNMR 2.1 BRUKER
5 structure solution X-PLOR 3.85 BRUNGER