SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents0.5 MM N-TIMP-1 U-15N
Solventn/a
Ionic Strength0.171
pH6.0
PressureAMBIENT
Temperature (K)293
Experiment(s):3D_15N-SEPARATED_NOESY
Sample Contents0.9 MM N-TIMP-1 U-15N,13C
Solventn/a
Ionic Strength0.171
pH6.0
PressureAMBIENT
Temperature (K)293
Experiment(s):3D TIME-SHARED NOESY-(13C,15N)-HSQC, 3D 13C FSCT-HSMQC-NOESY
Sample Contents0.7 MM N-TIMP-1 U-15N,13C
Solventn/a
Ionic Strength0.171
pH6.0
PressureAMBIENT
Temperature (K)293
Experiment(s):3D 13C NOESY-HMQC
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
BRUKER DRX 500.0
NMR Refinement
Method TORSION ANGLE DYNAMICS FOLLOWED BY CARTESIAN SIMULATED ANNEALING
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria STRUCTURES WITH THE LEAST RESTRAINT VIOLATIONS,STRUCTURES WITH THE LOWEST ENERGY
Conformers Calculated Total Number 120
Conformers Submitted Total Number 29
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 closest to the average,fewest violations
Additional NMR Experimental Information
1 3D HNHB, 3D HACAHB-COSY, 2D HMQC-J, 3D COUPLED HCACO, 3D HNCA-J, {15N} SPIN- ECHO DIFFERENCE 13C CT-HSQC, {13CO} SPIN-ECHO DIFFERENCE 13C CT-HSQC, 2D HN(CG) , 2D HN(COCG), 15N IPAP-HSQC, 3D 13CA-COUPLED HNCO, 13C'-COUPLED IN-PHASE 15N HSQC
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 refinement CNS 0.6 BRUNGER,A.T., ADAMS,P.D., CLORE,G.M., WARREN,G.L.
2 structure solution CNS 0.6 BRUNGER,A.T., ADAMS,P.D., CLORE,G.M., WARREN,G.L.
3 processing SYBYL TRIAD V6.2 OR V.6.3 TRIPOS INS., ST. LOUIS, MO