SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents1.4 MM VAT-N U-15N,13C; 40 MM PHOSPHATE BUFFER NA; 90% H2O, 10% D2O
Solventn/a
Ionic Strength80 MM
pH5.9
PressureAMBIENT
Temperature (K)320
Experiment(s):3D_13C-SEPARATED_NOESY, 3D_CNH-NOESY, 3D_NCH-NOESY, 3D_CCH-NOESY
Sample Contents1.2 MM VAT-N U-15N; 40 MM PHOSPHATE BUFFER NA; 90% H2O, 10% D2O
Solventn/a
Ionic Strength80 MM
pH5.9
PressureAMBIENT
Temperature (K)320
Experiment(s):3D_15N-SEPARATED_NOESY, 3D_NNH-NOESY
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
BRUKER DMX 600.0
BRUKER DMX 750.0
NMR Refinement
Method SIMULATED ANNEALING
Details STRUCTURES BASED ON 1923 DISTANCE RESTRAINTS; 1817 NOE BASED RESTRAINTS, 196 DIHEDRAL ANGLE RESTRAINTS, 56 J-COUPLING RESTRAINTS, 106 DISTANCE RESTRAINTS FOR H-BONDS, 158 CA AND 148 CB CHEMICAL SHIFT RESTRAINTS. REFINED WITH A CONFORMATIONAL DATABASE POTENTIAL
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria STRUCTURES WITH THE LEAST RESTRAINT VIOLATIONS
Conformers Calculated Total Number 50
Conformers Submitted Total Number 25
Additional NMR Experimental Information
1 THE STRUCTURE WAS DETERMINED USING TRIPLE-RESONANCE NMR SPECTROSCOPY. 3JHNHA COUPLING-CONSTANTS FROM AN HNHA SPECTRUM
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 structure solution X-PLOR 3.851 BRUNGER ET AL.
2 refinement X-PLOR 3.851 BRUNGER ET AL.
3 data analysis AURELIA 2.5.11 BRUKER
4 processing XWINNMR 2.5 BRUKER
5 collection XWINNMR 2.5 BRUKER