SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample ContentsUNLABELLED 1.5MM APAF-1 CARD 20MM SODIUM PHOSPHATE PH 6.7 75MM NACL 2MM DITHIOTHREITOL
Solventn/a
Ionic Strengthn/a
pH6.7
Pressuren/a
Temperature (K)30
Experiment(s):2D NOESY
Sample ContentsU-15N 1.5MM APAF-1 CARD 20MM SODIUM PHOSPHATE PH 6.7 75MM NACL 2MM DITHIOTHREITOL
Solventn/a
Ionic Strengthn/a
pH6.7
Pressuren/a
Temperature (K)30
Experiment(s):3D_15N-SEPARATED_NOESY, HNHA
Sample ContentsU-15N; U-13C 1.5MM APAF-1 CARD 20MM SODIUM PHOSPHATE PH 6.7 75MM NACL 2MM DITHIOTHREITOL
Solventn/a
Ionic Strengthn/a
pH6.7
Pressuren/a
Temperature (K)30
Experiment(s):3D_13C-SEPARATED_NOESY
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
Bruker DRX 600.0
Bruker AMX 500.0
NMR Refinement
Method DISTANCE GEOMETRY TORSION ANGLE DYNAMICS SIMULATED ANNEALING
Details THE STRUCTURES ARE BASED ON A TOTAL OF 2314 NOE-DERIVED DISTANCE CONSTRAINTS, 31 HYDROGEN BOND CONSTRAINTS AND 173 DIHEDRAL ANGLE CONSTRAINTS.
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria STRUCTURES WITH THE LEAST RESTRAINT VIOLATIONS,STRUCTURES WITH THE LOWEST ENERGY
Conformers Calculated Total Number 250
Conformers Submitted Total Number 20
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 closest to the average
Additional NMR Experimental Information
1 THE STRUCTURE WAS DETERMINED USING TRIPLE-RESONANCE NMR SPECTROSCOPY
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 structure solution version: 2.1 XWINNMR BRUKER (AG)
2 structure solution version: 1.3.13 XEASY BARTELS ET AL.
3 structure solution version: 1.5 DYANA GUNTERT ET AL.
4 refinement version: 3.851 X-PLOR BRUNGER