SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents1 MM ITP WITH 0.2 MM KLYN, PH 7.0 PHOSPHATE BUFFER
Solventn/a
Ionic Strengthn/a
pH7.0
PressureAMBIENT
Temperature (K)278
Experiment(s):2D NOESY, 2D TOCSY, 2D ROESY
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
Varian UNITY 500.0
Varian UNITY 600.0
NMR Refinement
Method THE SIMULATED ANNEALING PROTOCOL IN THE X-PLOR 3.1 MANUAL WAS USED FOR STRUCTURE CALCULATION. RESTRAINED POWELL MINIMIZATION INCOPORATED THE CHARMM FORCE FIELD USING THE TOP_ALL22 AND PAR_ALL22 FILES IN THE X-PLOR 3.1 LIBRARY. 107 NOE DERIVED DISTANCE RESTRAINTS WERE USED THROUGH OUT THE STRUCTURE CALCULATION
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria structures with favorable non-bond energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number 200
Conformers Submitted Total Number 1
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 closest to the average
Additional NMR Experimental Information
1 THIS STRUCTURE WAS DETERMINED USING STANDARD 2D HOMONUCLEAR TECHNIQUES
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 structure solution version: 3.1 X-PLOR BRUNGER, A.T.
2 refinement version: 23.2 CHARMM BROOKS, B.R. ET AL.