SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents0.4MM D4BC U-15N; 10MM PHOSPHATE BUFFER;90% H2O, 10% D2O
Solventn/a
Ionic Strength0.06M
pH6.1
PressureAMBIENT
Temperature (K)293
Experiment(s):2D NOESY, 3D_15N-SEPARATED_NOESY, HMQC-J
Sample Contents0.4MM D4BC U-15N; 10MM PHOSPHATE BUFFER;100% D2O
Solventn/a
Ionic Strength0.06M
pH6.1
PressureAMBIENT
Temperature (K)293
Experiment(s):2D NOESY
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
VARIAN INOVA 600.0
NMR Refinement
Method SIMULATED ANNEALING
Details THE STRUCTURES ARE BASED ON 1500 UNAMBIGUOUS NOE-DERIVED DISTANCE RESTRAINTS, 1034 AMBIGUOUS NOE-DERIVED DISTANCE RESTRAINTS, 42 DIHEDRAL ANGLE RESTRAINTS AND 30 DISTANCE RESTRAINTS FROM HYDROGEN BONDS. THE ARIA METHOD OF NILGES ET AL. (1997) WAS USED
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria LOWEST ENERGY
Conformers Calculated Total Number 50
Conformers Submitted Total Number 20
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 minimized average structure
Additional NMR Experimental Information
1 THIS STRUCTURE WAS CALCULATED USING THE ARIA METHOD
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 refinement X-PLOR 3.851 BRUNGER
2 structure solution X-PLOR 3.851 BRUNGER
3 data analysis XEASY 1.3.13 BARTELS ET AL.
4 processing VNMR 6.1B VARIAN AND ASSOCIATES