SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents5.6 MM [ABU3,35]SHK12-28,17-32; 90% H2O, 10% D2O (V/V)
Solventn/a
Ionic Strength5.6 MM PEPTIDE
pH5.0
PressureAMBIENT
Temperature (K)293.0
Experiment(s):2D NOESY, 2D-TOCSY, DQF-COSY
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
BRUKER AMX 500.0
BRUKER DRX 600.0
NMR Refinement
Method THE STRUCTURES WERE REFINED USING DISTANCE GEOMETRY, SIMULATED ANNEALING AND MOLECULAR DYNAMICS
Details THE STRUCTURES ARE BASED ON 328 NOE-DERIVED DISTANCE CONSTRAINTS AND 26 DIHEDRAL ANGLE RESTRAINTS
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria STRUCTURES WITH THE LOWEST ENERGY
Conformers Calculated Total Number 50
Conformers Submitted Total Number 20
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 closest to the average
Additional NMR Experimental Information
1 THIS STRUCTURE WAS DETERMINED USING STANDARD 2D HOMONUCLEAR TECHNIQUES.
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 refinement CHARMM 19 BROOKS
2 refinement X-PLOR 1.3 BRUNGER
3 structure solution DYANA 1.4 GUNTERT
4 data analysis XEASY 1.3.7 BARTELS
5 collection XWINNMR 2.1 BRUKER