SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents10% D2O/90% H2O
Solventn/a
Ionic Strength320 mM
pH5.8
Pressure1
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):NOESY, COSY, TOCSY
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
Bruker AMX600 600.0
NMR Refinement
Method SIMULATED ANNEALING, RESTRAINED MOLECULAR DYNAMICS
Details THE STRUCTURE CALCULATION FOLLOWED STANDARD PROCEDURES EMPLOYING A HYBRID DISTANCE GEOMETRY MOLECULAR DYNAMICS APPROACH WITH SIMULATED ANNEALING REFINEMENT AND SUBSEQUENT ENERGY MINIMIZATION. FOR THE REFINEMENT THE DIELECTRIC CONSTANT WAS CHANGED TO 4. STRUCTURE PARAMETERS WERE EXTRACTED FROM THE STANDARD FILES PARALLHDG.PRO AND TOPALLHDG.PRO OF X-PLOR 3.1. IN EACH ROUND OF THE STRUCTURE CALCULATION 30 STRUCTURES WERE CALCULATED. OF THE 30 STRUCTURES RESULTING FROM THE FINAL ROUND OF STRUCTURE CALCULATION, THOSE 10 STRUCTURES THAT SHOWED THE LOWEST TOTAL ENERGY VALUES WERE SELECTED FOR FURTHER CHARACTERIZATION.
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria ENERGY, AGREEMENT WITH EXPERIMENTAL DATA
Conformers Calculated Total Number 30
Conformers Submitted Total Number 10
Additional NMR Experimental Information
1 THE DISTANCE RESTRAINTS USED FOR STRUCTURE CALCULATION WERE OBTAINED FROM TWO-DIMENSIONAL HOMONUCLEAR 1H- NOESY SPECTRA.
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 refinement version: 3.1 X-PLOR BRUNGER
2 structure solution NDEE --
3 structure solution X-PLOR --