Citations in PubMed

Primary Citation PubMed: 18767151 Citations in PubMed

PDB ID Mentions in PubMed Central Article count: 1

Citations in PubMed

This linkout lists citations, indexed by PubMed, to the Primary Citation for this PDB ID.

PDB ID Mentions in PubMed Central

Data mentions are occurrences of PDB IDs in the full text articles from the PubMedCentral Open Access Subset of currently about 1 million articles. For each article, the sentences containing the PDB ID are listed. Article titles can be filtered by keywords and sorted by year.

  • 3 per page
  • 5 per page
  • 10 per page
  • view all
  • Publication Year
  • Ascending
  • Descending

Clustering procedures for the optimal selection of data sets from multiple crystals in macromolecular crystallography.

(2013) Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 69

PubMed: 23897484 | PubMedCentral: PMC3727331 | DOI: 10.1107/S0907444913012274

Beam transmission (%) 30 Wavelength (Å) 0.9786 Unit-cell parameters (Å) a = 81.03, c = 33.90 Resolution range (Å) 41.0–2.2 (2.3–2.2) 〈 I /σ( I )... #x0232a; 11.8 (5.7) Completeness (%) 98.8 (98.7) R merge (%) 7.2 (20.9) Resolution range (Å) 40.5–2.2 R / R free (%) 24.0/28.2 PDB code 2vk0 Table 5 Merging statistics for the clusters suggested by BLEND for the ultralente insulin test case Data sets R meas R p.i.m. Completeness (%) Multiplicity (%) 〈 I /σ( I )〉 Lowest resolution (Å) Highest resolution (Å) 6, 8 0.129 0.069 80.6 2.8 6.4 23.46 1.83 1, 4 0.172 0.106 88.3 1.9 3.3 24.38 1.83 3, 1, 4 0.196 0.114 91.5 2.5 4.3 24.39 1.83 5, 3, 1, 4 0.194 0.104 98.5 3.0 4.4 24.40 1.83 7, 9 0.190 0.122 87.5 1.7 4.0 24.25 1.83 2, 5, 3, 1, 4 0.199 0.100 99.5 3.7 5.0 24.37 1.83 6, 8, 7, 9 0.223 0.110 98.4 3.8 5.6 24.32 1.83 All data sets 0.406 0.145 99.7 7.4 5.1 24.35 1.83 Table 6 Final statistics for structures related to group A and group B of ultralente insulin The values in parentheses are for the high-resolution data range.

Using an initial model (PDB entry 2vk0 ; Wagner et al. , 2009 ▶ ) rigid-body refinement was first carried out, followed by alternating cycles of model building with Coot (Emsley et al. , 2010 ▶ ) and model refinement with REFMAC (Murshudov et al. , 2011 ▶ ).

Publication Year: 2013