Citations in PubMed

Primary Citation PubMed: 8521480 Citations in PubMed

PDB ID Mentions in PubMed Central Article count: 10

Citations in PubMed

This linkout lists citations, indexed by PubMed, to the Primary Citation for this PDB ID.

PDB ID Mentions in PubMed Central

Data mentions are occurrences of PDB IDs in the full text articles from the PubMedCentral Open Access Subset of currently about 1 million articles. For each article, the sentences containing the PDB ID are listed. Article titles can be filtered by keywords and sorted by year.

  • 3 per page
  • 5 per page
  • 10 per page
  • view all
  • Publication Year
  • Ascending
  • Descending

The association of tetrameric acetylcholinesterase with ColQ tail: a block normal mode analysis.

(2005) PLoS Comput Biol 1

PubMed: 16299589 | PubMedCentral: PMC1285061 | DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0010062

Supporting Information Accession Numbers The accession numbers for the proteins described in this paper can be found in the SwissProt database ( http://www.ebi.ac.uk/swissprot ): AChE (P21836), ColQ (... 35348), and PRiMA (Q810F0); and in the Protein Data Bank ( http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/ ): PRAD/WAT complex (1VZJ), compact AChE tetramer structure (1C2O), loose AChE tetramer structure (1C2B), [WAT] 4 PRAD complex (1VZJ), mouse AChE (1MAH), and acetylcholine receptor structure (1OED).

Publication Year: 2005


qPIPSA: relating enzymatic kinetic parameters and interaction fields.

(2007) BMC Bioinformatics 8

PubMed: 17919319 | PubMedCentral: PMC2174957 | DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-8-373

For AchE, the MIF comparison region was selected to be within 10Å of a point near His447 in the substrate active site gorge [ 25 ] (namely, the mid-point between the atomic coordinates of H447... D1 and Y124OH in the X-ray crystal structure with PDB identifier 1mah, subunit A).

Publication Year: 2007


Structural deformation upon protein-protein interaction: a structural alphabet approach.

(2008) BMC Struct Biol 8

PubMed: 18307769 | PubMedCentral: PMC2315654 | DOI: 10.1186/1472-6807-8-12

We consider the 3 classes from Table 3 , namely enzyme/substrate, antibody/antigen, and other; Table 3 Description of the complex set Type (number) Complexes PDB id Enzyme-substrate (23) 1ACB , 1AVX ,... 1AY7 , 1BVN , 1CGI , 1D6R , 1DFJ , 1E6E , 1EAW , 1EWY , 1EZU , 1F34 , 1HIA , 1KKL , 1MAH , 1PPE , 1TMQ , 1UDI , 2MTA , 2PCC , 2SIC , 2SNI , 7CEI Antibody-Antigen (10) 1AHW , 1BGX , 1BVK , 1DQJ , 1E6J , 1JPS , 1MLC , 1VFB , 1WEJ , 2VIS Other (35) 1A2K , 1AK4 , 1AKJ , 1ATN , 1B6C , 1BUH , 1DE4 , 1E96 , 1EER , 1F51 , 1FC2 , 1FQ1 , 1FQJ , 1GCQ , 1GP2 , 1GRN , 1H1V , 1HE1 , 1HE8 , 1I2M , 1I4D , 1IB1 , 1IBR , 1IJK , 1KLU , 1KTZ , 1KXP , 1M10 , 1ML0 , 1N2C , 1QA9 , 1RLB , 1SBB , 1WQ1 , 2BTF • the motif should be located in totality at the protein-protein interfaces of the complexes; • we do not consider runs of helical letters (A,a,V,W,Z,B,C) or extended letters (L,M,N,T,X,J,K).

Publication Year: 2008


A simple reference state makes a significant improvement in near-native selections from structurally refined docking decoys.

(2007) Proteins 69

PubMed: 17623864 | PubMedCentral: PMC2673351 | DOI: 10.1002/prot.21498

Table I The Number of Top 5 Decoys with rmsd < 10 Å given by EMPIRE and the RosettaDock scoring function Pdb ID a 1CGI 1CHO 2PTC 1TGS 2SNI 2SIC 1CSE 2KAI EMPIRE b 1 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 Roset... aDock c 4 3 2 5 4 5 2 4 Pdb ID 1BRC 1ACB 1BRS 1MAH 1UGH 1DFJ 1FSS 1AVW EMPIRE 5 3 4 5 5 5 3 5 RosettaDock 1 2 4 5 5 4 5 5 Pdb ID 1PPE 1TAB 1UDI 1STF 2TEC 4 HTC 1MLC 1WEJ EMPIRE 5 5 5 5 5 5 2 2 RosettaDock 5 5 5 5 5 5 0 0 Pdb ID 1AHW 1DQJ 1BVK 1FBI 2JEL 1BQL 1JHL 1NQA EMPIRE 0 1 1 5 5 2 1 5 RosettaDock 5 2 5 3 5 5 1 5 Pdb ID 1NMB 1MEL 2VIR 1EO8 1QFU 1IAI 2PCC 1WQ1 EMPIRE 5 5 3 1 4 3 4 4 RosettaDock 5 5 4 1 5 0 3 3 Pdb ID AVZ 1MDA 1IGC 1ATN 1GLA 1SPB 2BTF 1A0Q EMPIRE 0 4 1 5 5 5 3 4 RosettaDock 0 3 2 5 1 5 4 1 Pdb ID 1BTH 1FIN 1FQ1 1GOT 1EFU 3HHR #(≥3) d #(>) EMPIRE 0 0 4 5 2 2 39 21 e RosettaDock 0 0 2 0 0 0 34 10 f a Enzyme/Inhibitor: the first 22 protein complexes (1CGI-4HTC); antibody-antigen: the next 16 protein complexes (1MLC-1IAI); the others: (2PCC to 1A0Q); and the difficult set (1BTH to 3HHR).

Publication Year: 2007


Protein-protein docking using region-based 3D Zernike descriptors.

(2009) BMC Bioinformatics 10

PubMed: 20003235 | PubMedCentral: PMC2800122 | DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-407

HEX ZDOCK LZerD Complex Rank lRMSD HITS2K Rank lRMSD HITS2K Rank lRMSD HITS2K 1ACB 694 8.3 3 185 9.98 5 21 9.98 2 1AHW 234 8 3 34 9.86 20 5 2.68 43 1AKJ 209 9.6 10 - - - - - - 1AVX 108 8.9 7 604 9.43 ... - - - 1AY7 645 9.9 4 568 9.39 11 1884 6.13 1 1B6C 593 9 2 182 5.6 10 73 6.2 10 1BUH 743 7.7 2 - - - 599 9.73 1 1BVK - - - 70 7.56 1125 9.83 10 1BVN 63 9.1 20 29 8.65 52 2 6.89 49 1CGI 42 9.4 17 145 3.88 32 86 8.13 12 1D6R 447 7.7 1 303 8.44 3 344 7.84 8 1DE4 946 8.6 1 - - - - - - 1DFJ 17 9.5 14 5 6.64 67 - - - 1DQJ - - - 152 9.82 23 - - - 1E6E 109 5.6 10 - - - 52 4.49 10 1E6J - - - 12 5.34 93 87 9.97 20 1E96 - - - - - - 1375 8.91 1 1EAW 9 5 20 3 5.43 87 6 9.95 19 1EER 609 9.2 8 - - - - - - 1EWY 76 9.1 12 22 8.08 51 103 9.91 110 1EZU - - - - - - 815 7.89 3 1F34 124 6.7 11 5 5.45 20 - - - 1F51 371 9.6 5 602 9.78 4 1101 8.31 1 1FQJ 41 8 12 - - - 1014 9.63 3 1FSK 5 1.8 16 1 4.04 149 15 6.23 28 1GHQ - - - - - - 1571 9.14 1 1GRN 914 9.1 2 1704 5.81 2 1407 7.41 2 1HE1 37 6.4 18 23 8.14 8 47 6.2 7 1HIA 51 8.7 6 - - - 1 9.49 74 1I4D - - - - - - 286 9.11 2 1I9R 82 2.1 8 104 9.07 16 104 9.41 10 1IJK 1012 8.7 3 - - - - - - 1IQD - - - 492 8.99 11 41 6.46 27 1JPS - - - 171 8.51 7 292 2.01 20 1K4C 21 9.6 1 - - - 219 9.78 6 1KAC 687 8.7 1 - - - 655 3.95 3 1KXP 36 9.4 13 1616 7.11 2 1226 8.05 1 1KXQ 488 7.1 5 116 7.58 29 73 4.33 16 1M10 514 9.5 2 - - - - - - 1MAH 2 1.2 20 92 3.86 9 92 2.43 2 1ML0 - - - 36 2.87 35 121 5.71 2 1MLC 408 3.6 2 110 6.17 12 1834 4.48 1 1NCA 116 1.2 5 14 7.08 49 270 9.97 2 1NSN 142 1.5 6 185 5.07 19 94 8.61 4 1PPE 2 9.7 47 1 0.86 358 1 2.26 184 1QA9 - - - - - - 546 8.07 6 1QFW - - - 257 8.63 4 108 9.54 2 1TMQ 356 5.9 9 314 6.12 11 50 3.71 11 1UDI 8 6.2 9 32 8.04 34 19 6.4 16 1VFB - - - 22 8.52 65 150 8.7 22 1WEJ - - - 81 8.36 42 156 9.82 18 1WQ1 125 7.1 10 610 9.9 5 32 9.79 11 2BTF - - - 553 6.39 3 - - - 2JEL 164 6 3 45 4.49 86 66 6.81 35 2MTA 136 9 4 - - - 4 7.57 48 2QFW - - - - - - 68 9.01 11 2SIC 57 8.8 8 173 8.62 18 127 4.59 6 2SNI 256 9.6 7 534 9.69 4 - - - 7CEI 61 8.7 5 106 7.11 28 - - - Summary HEX ZDOCK LZerD Mean 206 173 164 Rank<100 17 19 22 Rank<500 32 33 34 Rank<1000 42 39 38 Rank<2000 43 41 47 Win 18 20 22 The results of HEX are taken from the columns of "U-U shape-only Blind search" in Table 3 of the paper by Ritchie et al .

Original ZDOCK Rank Context Shapes (CS) PatchDock ZDOCK Decoys Reranked by LZerD Score LZerD Complex Rank a) iRMSD HIT2K Rank iRMSD RMSD iRMSD Rank iRMSD HIT2K Rank iRMSD HIT2K 1AHW 268 2.28 21 402 2.46 181 2.49 15 1.68 50 5 1.34 42 1AK4 - b) - - - - - - (NA NA NA) 43787 2.35 0 1AKJ 4872 2.29 0 - - - - 1985 1.93 1 - - - 1AVX 2863 2.23 0 - - - - 5689 2.22 0 786 2.41 2 1AY7 5584 1.33 0 - - - - 394 1.1 7 1884 1.98 1 1B6C 1717 2.43 2 - - - - 497 2.13 8 1001 2.41 1 1BJ1 129 0.86 49 1893 1.93 - - 306 1.01 20 298 1.86 7 1BUH 14556 2.37 0 - - - - 11230 2.42 0 12251 1.6 0 1BVK 3970 1.94 0 - - 2754 2.27 9560 2.43 0 5515 2.24 0 1BVN 502 1.97 13 34 2.34 - - 8 2.26 59 27 2.32 6 1CGI 145 2.44 9 - - 1120 2.11 1775 2.14 1 9041 2.1 0 1D6R 2951 2.03 0 - - - - 5022 2.49 0 2619 2.24 0 1DFJ 9 2.27 40 - - - - 9350 2.14 0 - - - 1DQJ 2287 2.48 0 - - - - 5391 2.32 0 20816 2.09 0 1E6E 22643 2.08 0 - - - - 432 1.94 2 52 2.13 8 1E6J 15 1.56 34 - - - - 2509 1.81 0 439 2.18 8 1E96 3094 2.26 0 - - - - 882 1.88 2 216 2.14 2 1EAW 3 1.54 62 94 2.29 85 2.29 5 1.48 111 20 2.42 10 1EWY 259 2.32 2 - - - - 1007 2.14 4 349 2.36 14 1EZU 1100 1.94 3 - - - - 589 1.42 4 824 1.21 2 1F34 5 2.2 13 - - 490 1.81 5082 1.61 0 - - - 1F51 230 2.18 4 - - - - 154 1.76 5 3545 1.58 0 1FQJ 9889 2.29 0 - - - - 628 2.39 2 - - - 1FSK 1 1.63 105 20 1.57 221 2.39 29 1.57 76 15 2.4 11 1GCQ 24339 2.29 0 - - - - 39221 2.29 0 9418 1.8 0 1GHQ - - - - - - - (NA NA NA) 15357 1.68 0 1GRN 1704 2.34 2 - - - - 1884 1.74 1 1407 2.18 1 1HE1 4672 1.31 0 1029 2.17 - - 51 2 8 267 1.98 2 1HIA - - - - - - - (NA NA NA) 44189 2.42 0 1I9R 50 2.45 41 - - - - 57 1.96 10 95 2.39 21 1IJK 52731 2.44 0 - - - - 39460 2.44 0 6731 2.45 0 1IQD 612 2.27 5 - - - - 36 0.99 27 41 1.2 18 1JPS 171 1.81 9 - - - - 5305 1.37 0 292 0.9 20 1K4C 20806 1.53 0 - - - - 4468 1.18 0 1188 1.43 7 1KAC 2896 2.33 0 - - - - 1313 2.33 1 655 2.18 3 1KTZ 53599 1.69 0 - - - - 33926 1.69 0 12162 1.19 0 1KXP 1734 2.36 1 - - - - 32023 1.91 0 14208 2.22 0 1KXQ 212 1.91 13 2226 1.73 - - 629 1.24 4 73 1.68 14 1MAH 92 1.31 9 597 1.16 887 2.28 541 0.89 6 92 0.87 2 1ML0 36 1.56 21 - - 231 2.02 406 1.37 6 559 2.38 3 1MLC 110 1.19 12 18 2.28 - - 243 1.07 12 1834 1.16 1 1NCA 14 1.93 47 - - - - 302 1.55 12 12528 1.5 0 1NSN 185 1.81 5 26 1.79 - - 147 1.81 13 945 2.29 1 1PPE 1 0.57 218 2 2.31 - - 1 0.72 194 1 0.83 68 1QA9 5672 1.88 0 - - - - 5924 1.82 0 1381 2.19 3 1QFW 257 1.14 7 597 1.73 - - 136 2.31 17 108 1.24 4 1RLB - - - - - - - (NA NA NA) 46073 1.24 0 1TMQ 314 1.88 11 783 1.68 1 1.96 90 1.45 19 50 1.45 5 1UDI 258 2.17 4 2649 2.14 27 2.42 219 2.39 3 59 2.36 6 1VFB 2734 1.79 0 228 2.46 - - 1534 1.61 1 1303 1.69 1 1WEJ 465 2.37 8 - - - - 916 1.97 1 3914 2.06 6 1WQ1 1101 2.49 2 - - - - 284 2.05 2 141 1.87 2 2JEL 45 1.79 33 - - - - 149 2.44 19 133 2.49 9 2MTA - - - - - 515 2.19 (NA NA NA) 606 1.64 11 2PCC - - - - - - - (NA NA NA) 4542 2.31 0 2QFW 832 2.29 3 33 2.32 - - 42 1.99 17 68 1.55 29 2SIC 173 1.86 24 1077 2.28 - - 17 1.85 61 12 2.04 9 2SNI 17906 2.44 0 - - - - 428 2.33 2 - - - 7CEI 106 1.97 24 2290 1.9 366 1.07 705 1.57 7 6765 2.03 0 Summary c) ZDOCK CS PatchDock (PD) LZerD Rerank LZerD Rank<100 11 7 3 11 14 Rank<500 26 9 6 26 23 Rank<1000 29 12 9 32 29 Rank<2000 33 15 10 38 36 Wins vs. LZerD Rerank ZDOCK/LZerD Rerank 26/26 CS/LZerD Rerank 5/34 PD/LZerD Rerank 7/34 - - Wins vs. LZerD ZDOCK/LZerD 24/33 CS/LZerD 5/34 PD/LZerD 8/34 LZerD Rerank/LZerD 24/28 - LZerD results are compared with ZDOCK, Context Shapes, and PatchDock.

Publication Year: 2009


Sampling the conformation of protein surface residues for flexible protein docking.

(2010) BMC Bioinformatics 11

PubMed: 21092317 | PubMedCentral: PMC3002368 | DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-575

Table 1 The different docking test cases included in our experiments Complex PDB ID 1ACB 1AHW 1AK4 1AKJ 1AY7 1B6C 1BJ1 1BKD 1BUH 1BVK 1BVN 1CGI 1D6R 1DFJ 1DQJ 1E6E 1E6J 1EAW 1EER 1EWY 1FC2 1FSK 1GHQ 1... 9R 1IBR 1IQD 1KAC 1KTZ 1KXQ 1M10 1MAH 1ML0 1MLC 1NCA 1NSN 1QFW 1R0R 1S1Q 1SBB 1TMQ 1UDI 1VFB 1WEJ 1WQ1 1Y64 2AJF 2B42 2FD6 2I25 2JEL 2MTA 2QFW a 2SIC 2UUY 2VIS 7CEI a Note that the name 2QFW does not correspond to the actual PDB file with this ID.

Publication Year: 2010


Benchmarking and analysis of protein docking performance in Rosetta v3.2.

(2011) PLoS One 6

PubMed: 21829626 | PubMedCentral: PMC3149062 | DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022477

PDB Difficulty | type N 5 µ(N 5 ) [σ(N 5 )] P success Irmsd CAPRI quality PDB Difficulty | type N 5 µ (N 5 ) [σ(N 5 )] P success Irmsd CAPRI quality 1OPH rigid-body | E... 5 5.0 [0.0] 1.00 0.23 *** 1YVB rigid-body | E 4 4.0 [0.9] 0.71 1.32 ** 1ML0 rigid-body | O 5 5.0 [0.0] 1.00 0.40 *** 1ZHI rigid-body | O 4 4.0 [0.9] 0.72 1.47 ** 1KTZ rigid-body | O 5 5.0 [0.0] 1.00 0.51 *** 1XQS medium | O 4 3.9 [1.0] 0.70 1.47 ** 1PPE rigid-body | E 5 5.0 [0.0] 1.00 0.91 *** 2OOB rigid-body | O 4 3.9 [1.2] 0.69 1.04 ** 1B6C rigid-body | O 5 5.0 [0.0] 1.00 1.51 ** 1DFJ rigid-body | E 4 3.6 [1.4] 0.57 1.39 ** 2HLE rigid-body | O 5 5.0 [0.2] 1.00 0.89 *** 1BJ1 rigid-body | AB 4 3.6 [1.2] 0.57 2.25 * 1KXP rigid-body | O 5 5.0 [0.2] 1.00 1.16 ** 2CFH medium | O 4 3.6 [1.1] 0.56 1.25 ** 2HRK medium | O 5 5.0 [0.2] 0.99 1.42 ** 1BVK rigid-body | A 3 3.5 [1.2] 0.51 1.77 ** 1QA9 rigid-body | O 5 5.0 [0.1] 1.00 0.59 *** 1AVX rigid-body | E 3 3.4 [1.1] 0.50 1.87 ** 1FSK rigid-body | AB 5 5.0 [0.1] 1.00 1.03 ** 1MAH rigid-body | E 3 3.4 [1.1] 0.50 1.94 ** 1JPS rigid-body | A 5 4.9 [0.5] 0.97 1.15 ** 1VFB rigid-body | A 4 3.4 [1.1] 0.50 1.96 ** 1AK4 rigid-body | O 5 4.9 [0.5] 0.97 1.36 ** 2SNI rigid-body | E 3 3.3 [1.1] 0.47 1.14 ** 1UDI rigid-body | E 5 4.9 [0.4] 0.98 2.17 * 1KXQ rigid-body | AB 3 3.3 [1.1] 0.44 1.25 ** 1D6R rigid-body | E 5 4.9 [0.3] 0.99 2.14 * 1BUH rigid-body | O 3 3.3 [1.1] 0.44 1.73 ** 7CEI rigid-body | E 5 4.8 [0.6] 0.94 0.79 *** 1XD3 rigid-body | O 3 3.3 [1.1] 0.45 2.69 * 2UUY rigid-body | E 5 4.7 [0.7] 0.93 1.30 ** 1E4K difficult | A 4 3.2 [1.3] 0.45 1.98 ** 1E6E rigid-body | E 5 4.7 [0.6] 0.94 0.79 *** 1E6J rigid-body | A 3 3.2 [1.2] 0.40 2.48 * 1SBB rigid-body | O 5 4.6 [0.7] 0.91 0.60 *** 1HIA rigid-body | E 3 3.2 [1.1] 0.40 1.95 ** 2C0L difficult | O 5 4.6 [0.7] 0.91 1.15 ** 2SIC rigid-body | E 3 3.1 [1.3] 0.40 0.59 *** 1IQD rigid-body | AB 5 4.5 [0.8] 0.89 1.26 ** 2FD6 rigid-body | A 3 3.1 [1.2] 0.38 1.85 ** 1AHW rigid-body | A 5 4.5 [0.7] 0.89 1.38 ** 1HE1 rigid-body | O 3 3.0 [1.2] 0.36 1.31 ** 1GCQ rigid-body | O 5 4.4 [0.8] 0.88 0.72 *** 2JEL rigid-body | AB 3 3.0 [1.1] 0.36 0.40 *** 1EAW rigid-body | E 4 4.4 [0.8] 0.87 1.31 ** 1AY7 rigid-body | E 3 2.9 [1.1] 0.32 1.55 ** 1FC2 rigid-body | O 4 4.4 [0.8] 0.84 1.53 ** 1WQ1 medium | O 3 2.8 [1.3] 0.30 1.48 ** 1GPW rigid-body | O 4 4.4 [0.8] 0.88 1.98 ** 2QFW rigid-body | AB 3 2.8 [1.2] 0.30 0.64 *** 2MTA rigid-body | E 4 4.3 [0.9] 0.81 0.66 *** 1IJK medium | E 3 2.8 [1.2] 0.28 2.35 * 1BVN rigid-body | E 4 4.0 [1.0] 0.72 1.35 ** 1NCA rigid-body | AB 3 2.7 [1.3] 0.27 0.46 *** 1CGI rigid-body | E 4 4.0 [1.0] 0.74 1.76 ** 2I25 rigid-body | A 3 2.2 [1.2] 0.15 1.80 ** 10.1371/journal.pone.0022477.

Publication Year: 2011


Partner-aware prediction of interacting residues in protein-protein complexes from sequence data.

(2011) PLoS One 6

PubMed: 22194998 | PubMedCentral: PMC3237601 | DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029104

g004 Figure 4 Binding site predictions mapped to the three-dimensional structure of Acetylcholinesterase in complex with Toxin F-VII Fasciculin-2 (PDB ID: 1MAH, chains A and F respectively in red and ... lue color cartoons).

A typical example of the partner-unaware and pair-wise, partner-aware predictions is shown in Figure 4 using Acetylcholinesterase in complex with Toxin F-VII Fasciculin-2 (PDB ID: 1MAH).

Publication Year: 2011


Re-docking scheme for generating near-native protein complexes by assembling residue interaction fingerprints.

(2013) PLoS One 8

PubMed: 23874954 | PubMedCentral: PMC3712918 | DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069365

Rigid-body (34) 1AK4 1AVX 1AY7 1B6C 1BUH 1BVN 1CGI 1D6R 1DFJ 1E6E 1E96 1EAW 1EWY 1F34 1FC2 1FQJ 1GCQ 1GHQ 1HE1 1KAC 1KTZ 1KXP 1KXQ 1MAH 1PPE 1QA9 1SBB 1TMQ 1UDI 2BTF 2PCC 2SIC 2SNI 7CEI Medium Difficu... ty (6) 1ACB 1GRN 1HE8 1I2M 1M10 1WQ1 Difficult (4) 1ATN 1FQ1 1H1V 1IBR Definition of IFP and Similarity between Decoys As suggested previously, it is sufficient to compare the interacting fragments rather than the whole structures to obtain information on near-native molecular interactions [9] , [10] .

Publication Year: 2013


PubMed ID is not available.

Published in 2014

PubMedCentral: PMC4443796

Rigid-body (34) 1AK4, 1AVX, 1AY7, 1B6C, 1BUH, 1BVN, 1CGI, 1D6R, 1DFJ, 1E6E, 1E96, 1EAW, 1EWY, 1F34, 1FC2, 1FQJ, 1GCQ, 1GHQ, 1HE1, 1KAC, 1KTZ, 1KXP, 1KXQ, 1MAH, 1PPE, 1QA9, 1SBB, 1TMQ, 1UDI, 2BTF, 2PCC... 2SIC, 2SNI, 7CEI Medium Difficulty (6) 1ACB, 1GRN, 1HE8, 1I2M, 1M10, 1WQ1 Difficult (4) 1ATN, 1FQ1, 1H1V, 1IBR Table 4 The 120 complex structures selected from the ZLAB Benchmark 4.0 dataset (large dataset).

Publication Year: 2014