3O75

Crystal structure of Cra transcriptional dual regulator from Pseudomonas putida in complex with fructose 1-phosphate'


Experimental Data Snapshot

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 2.30 Å
  • R-Value Free: 0.222 
  • R-Value Work: 0.184 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.186 

wwPDB Validation   3D Report Full Report


Ligand Structure Quality Assessment 


This is version 1.4 of the entry. See complete history


Literature

Fructose 1-phosphate is the preferred effector of the metabolic regulator Cra of Pseudomonas putida

Chavarria, M.Santiago, C.Platero, R.Krell, T.Casasnovas, J.M.de Lorenzo, V.

(2011) J Biol Chem 286: 9351-9359

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M110.187583
  • Primary Citation of Related Structures:  
    3O74, 3O75

  • PubMed Abstract: 

    The catabolite repressor/activator (Cra) protein is a global sensor and regulator of carbon fluxes through the central metabolic pathways of gram-negative bacteria. To examine the nature of the effector (or effectors) that signal such fluxes to the protein of Pseudomonas putida, the Cra factor of this soil microorganism has been purified and characterized and its three-dimensional structure determined. Analytical ultracentrifugation, gel filtration, and mobility shift assays showed that the effector-free Cra is a dimer that binds an operator DNA sequence in the promoter region of the fruBKA cluster. Furthermore, fructose 1-phosphate (F1P) was found to most efficiently dissociate the Cra-DNA complex. Thermodynamic parameters of the F1P-Cra-DNA interaction calculated by isothermal titration calorimetry revealed that the factor associates tightly to the DNA sequence 5'-TTAAACGTTTCA-3' (K(D) = 26.3 ± 3.1 nM) and that F1P binds the protein with an apparent stoichiometry of 1.06 ± 0.06 molecules per Cra monomer and a K(D) of 209 ± 20 nM. Other possible effectors, like fructose 1,6-bisphosphate, did not display a significant affinity for the regulator under the assay conditions. Moreover, the structure of Cra and its co-crystal with F1P at a 2-Å resolution revealed that F1P fits optimally the geometry of the effector pocket. Our results thus single out F1P as the preferred metabolic effector of the Cra protein of P. putida.


  • Organizational Affiliation

    Systems Biology Program, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología-Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, 28049 Cantoblanco-Madrid, Spain.


Macromolecules
Find similar proteins by:  (by identity cutoff)  |  3D Structure
Entity ID: 1
MoleculeChains Sequence LengthOrganismDetailsImage
Fructose transport system repressor FruR
A, B
272Pseudomonas putida KT2440Mutation(s): 0 
Gene Names: ECK0081
UniProt
Find proteins for Q88PQ6 (Pseudomonas putida (strain ATCC 47054 / DSM 6125 / CFBP 8728 / NCIMB 11950 / KT2440))
Explore Q88PQ6 
Go to UniProtKB:  Q88PQ6
Entity Groups  
Sequence Clusters30% Identity50% Identity70% Identity90% Identity95% Identity100% Identity
UniProt GroupQ88PQ6
Sequence Annotations
Expand
  • Reference Sequence
Small Molecules
Ligands 1 Unique
IDChains Name / Formula / InChI Key2D Diagram3D Interactions
F1X
Query on F1X

Download Ideal Coordinates CCD File 
C [auth A],
D [auth B]
1-O-phosphono-beta-D-fructofuranose
C6 H13 O9 P
RHKKZBWRNHGJEZ-ARQDHWQXSA-N
Binding Affinity Annotations 
IDSourceBinding Affinity
F1X Binding MOAD:  3O75 Kd: 209 (nM) from 1 assay(s)
PDBBind:  3O75 Kd: 209 (nM) from 1 assay(s)
Experimental Data & Validation

Experimental Data

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 2.30 Å
  • R-Value Free: 0.222 
  • R-Value Work: 0.184 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.186 
  • Space Group: P 1 21 1
Unit Cell:
Length ( Å )Angle ( ˚ )
a = 37.711α = 90
b = 120.22β = 107.41
c = 61.86γ = 90
Software Package:
Software NamePurpose
PHENIXrefinement
PDB_EXTRACTdata extraction
ADSCdata collection
XDSdata reduction
SCALAdata scaling
PHASERphasing

Structure Validation

View Full Validation Report



Ligand Structure Quality Assessment 


Entry History 

Deposition Data

Revision History  (Full details and data files)

  • Version 1.0: 2011-01-12
    Type: Initial release
  • Version 1.1: 2011-07-13
    Changes: Version format compliance
  • Version 1.2: 2011-12-14
    Changes: Database references
  • Version 1.3: 2020-07-29
    Type: Remediation
    Reason: Carbohydrate remediation
    Changes: Data collection, Derived calculations
  • Version 1.4: 2023-11-01
    Changes: Data collection, Database references, Refinement description, Structure summary