1JUG

LYSOZYME FROM ECHIDNA MILK (TACHYGLOSSUS ACULEATUS)


Experimental Data Snapshot

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 1.90 Å
  • R-Value Free: 0.229 
  • R-Value Work: 0.168 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.170 

wwPDB Validation   3D Report Full Report


This is version 1.3 of the entry. See complete history


Literature

Structure of the calcium-binding echidna milk lysozyme at 1.9 A resolution.

Guss, J.M.Messer, M.Costello, M.Hardy, K.Kumar, V.

(1997) Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 53: 355-363

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S0907444996015831
  • Primary Citation of Related Structures:  
    1JUG

  • PubMed Abstract: 

    A lysozyme isolated from the milk of a monotreme, the echidna, Tachyglossus aculeatus multiaculeatus, has been crystallized (space group P2(1), with unit-cell dimensions a = 37.1, b = 42.0, c = 38.1 A, beta = 91 degrees and Z = 2) and the structure refined to an R value of 0.167 for all measured data in the resolution range 7.0-1.9 A. It had previously been inferred from sequence homology with alpha-lactalbumins that echidna milk lysozyme (EML) would bind one calcium ion per molecule. This has been confirmed in the present study in which the largest peak in a difference Fourier synthesis is associated with a calcium ion. The calcium binding site of EML is very similar to that observed in baboon and human alpha-lactalbumins, and in a human lysozyme engineered to contain a calcium-binding site. The overall fold of the protein is similar to that of chick-type lysozymes. EML, like pigeon lysozyme, has only 125 residues terminating at a cysteine but in EML this forms a disulfide with a cysteine at residue 9 whereas the equivalent cysteine residue in all other lysozymes of known sequence occurs at position 6. These changes cause some minor structural rearrangements. The binding of calcium appears to have had little effect on the polypeptide backbone conformation and caused only small changes in the conformation of side chains coordinating the calcium ion. A homology modelling study [Acharya, Stuart, Phillips, McKenzie & Teahan (1994). J. Protein Chem. 13(6), 569-584] correctly predicted the overall structure of EML and the nature of its calcium binding site but generally failed to model some more subtle differences observed in the EML structure as evidenced by the fact that the homology model more closely resembles the starting structure from which the model was derived than it does the crystal structure.


  • Organizational Affiliation

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia. m.guss@biochem.usyd.edu.au


Macromolecules
Find similar proteins by:  (by identity cutoff)  |  3D Structure
Entity ID: 1
MoleculeChains Sequence LengthOrganismDetailsImage
LYSOZYME125Tachyglossus aculeatusMutation(s): 0 
EC: 3.2.1.17
UniProt
Find proteins for P37156 (Tachyglossus aculeatus aculeatus)
Explore P37156 
Go to UniProtKB:  P37156
Entity Groups  
Sequence Clusters30% Identity50% Identity70% Identity90% Identity95% Identity100% Identity
UniProt GroupP37156
Sequence Annotations
Expand
  • Reference Sequence
Small Molecules
Ligands 1 Unique
IDChains Name / Formula / InChI Key2D Diagram3D Interactions
CA
Query on CA

Download Ideal Coordinates CCD File 
B [auth A]CALCIUM ION
Ca
BHPQYMZQTOCNFJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N
Experimental Data & Validation

Experimental Data

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 1.90 Å
  • R-Value Free: 0.229 
  • R-Value Work: 0.168 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.170 
  • Space Group: P 1 21 1
Unit Cell:
Length ( Å )Angle ( ˚ )
a = 37.12α = 90
b = 41.98β = 91.04
c = 38.09γ = 90
Software Package:
Software NamePurpose
DENZOdata reduction
SCALEPACKdata scaling
X-PLORmodel building
PROLSQrefinement
X-PLORrefinement
X-PLORphasing

Structure Validation

View Full Validation Report



Entry History 

Deposition Data

  • Released Date: 1997-04-21 
  • Deposition Author(s): Guss, J.M.

Revision History  (Full details and data files)

  • Version 1.0: 1997-04-21
    Type: Initial release
  • Version 1.1: 2008-03-24
    Changes: Version format compliance
  • Version 1.2: 2011-07-13
    Changes: Version format compliance
  • Version 1.3: 2023-08-09
    Changes: Database references, Derived calculations, Refinement description