3OSN

Structural Basis for Proficient Incorporation of dTTP Opposite O6-Methylguanine by Human DNA Polymerase Iota


Experimental Data Snapshot

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 1.90 Å
  • R-Value Free: 0.241 
  • R-Value Work: 0.208 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.210 

wwPDB Validation   3D Report Full Report


Ligand Structure Quality Assessment 


This is version 1.2 of the entry. See complete history


Literature

Structural Basis for Proficient Incorporation of dTTP Opposite O6-Methylguanine by Human DNA Polymerase {iota}.

Pence, M.G.Choi, J.Y.Egli, M.Guengerich, F.P.

(2010) J Biol Chem 285: 40666-40672

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M110.183665
  • Primary Citation of Related Structures:  
    3NGD, 3OSN

  • PubMed Abstract: 

    O(6)-methylguanine (O(6)-methylG) is highly mutagenic and is commonly found in DNA exposed to methylating agents, even physiological ones (e.g. S-adenosylmethionine). The efficiency of a truncated, catalytic DNA polymerase ι core enzyme was determined for nucleoside triphosphate incorporation opposite O(6)-methylG, using steady-state kinetic analyses. The results presented here corroborate previous work from this laboratory using full-length pol ι, which showed that dTTP incorporation occurs with high efficiency opposite O(6)-methylG. Misincorporation of dTTP opposite O(6)-methylG occurred with ∼6-fold higher efficiency than incorporation of dCTP. Crystal structures of the truncated form of pol ι with O(6)-methylG as the template base and incoming dCTP or dTTP were solved and showed that O(6)-methylG is rotated into the syn conformation in the pol ι active site and that dTTP misincorporation by pol ι is the result of Hoogsteen base pairing with the adduct. Both dCTP and dTTP base paired with the Hoogsteen edge of O(6)-methylG. A single, short hydrogen bond formed between the N3 atom of dTTP and the N7 atom of O(6)-methylG. Protonation of the N3 atom of dCTP and bifurcation of the N3 hydrogen between the N7 and O(6) atoms of O(6)-methylG allow base pairing of the lesion with dCTP. We conclude that differences in the Hoogsteen hydrogen bonding between nucleotides is the main factor in the preferential selectivity of dTTP opposite O(6)-methylG by human pol ι, in contrast to the mispairing modes observed previously for O(6)-methylG in the structures of the model DNA polymerases Sulfolobus solfataricus Dpo4 and Bacillus stearothermophilus DNA polymerase I.


  • Organizational Affiliation

    Department of Biochemistry and Center in Molecular Toxicology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-0146, USA.


Macromolecules

Find similar proteins by:  (by identity cutoff)  |  3D Structure
Entity ID: 2
MoleculeChains Sequence LengthOrganismDetailsImage
DNA polymerase iotaC [auth A]420Homo sapiensMutation(s): 0 
Gene Names: POLIRAD30B
EC: 2.7.7.7
UniProt & NIH Common Fund Data Resources
Find proteins for Q9UNA4 (Homo sapiens)
Explore Q9UNA4 
Go to UniProtKB:  Q9UNA4
PHAROS:  Q9UNA4
GTEx:  ENSG00000101751 
Entity Groups  
Sequence Clusters30% Identity50% Identity70% Identity90% Identity95% Identity100% Identity
UniProt GroupQ9UNA4
Sequence Annotations
Expand
  • Reference Sequence

Find similar nucleic acids by:  Sequence   |   3D Structure  

Entity ID: 1
MoleculeChains LengthOrganismImage
5'-D(*TP*CP*TP*(6OG)P*GP*GP*GP*TP*CP*CP*TP*AP*GP*GP*AP*CP*CP*(DOC))-3'A [auth B],
B [auth C]
18N/A
Sequence Annotations
Expand
  • Reference Sequence
Experimental Data & Validation

Experimental Data

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 1.90 Å
  • R-Value Free: 0.241 
  • R-Value Work: 0.208 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.210 
  • Space Group: P 65 2 2
Unit Cell:
Length ( Å )Angle ( ˚ )
a = 97.973α = 90
b = 97.973β = 90
c = 202.757γ = 120
Software Package:
Software NamePurpose
ADSCdata collection
PHASERphasing
REFMACrefinement
HKL-3000data reduction
HKL-3000data scaling

Structure Validation

View Full Validation Report



Ligand Structure Quality Assessment 


Entry History 

Deposition Data

  • Released Date: 2010-10-20 
  • Deposition Author(s): Pence, M.G.

Revision History  (Full details and data files)

  • Version 1.0: 2010-10-20
    Type: Initial release
  • Version 1.1: 2011-07-13
    Changes: Version format compliance
  • Version 1.2: 2023-09-06
    Changes: Data collection, Database references, Derived calculations, Refinement description