3KGC

Isolated ligand binding domain dimer of GluA2 ionotropic glutamate receptor in complex with glutamate, LY 404187 and ZK 200775


Experimental Data Snapshot

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 1.55 Å
  • R-Value Free: 0.224 
  • R-Value Work: 0.196 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.198 

wwPDB Validation   3D Report Full Report


Ligand Structure Quality Assessment 


This is version 1.5 of the entry. See complete history


Literature

X-ray structure, symmetry and mechanism of an AMPA-subtype glutamate receptor

Sobolevsky, A.I.Rosconi, M.P.Gouaux, E.

(2009) Nature 462: 745-755

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08624
  • Primary Citation of Related Structures:  
    3KG2, 3KGC

  • PubMed Abstract: 

    Ionotropic glutamate receptors mediate most excitatory neurotransmission in the central nervous system and function by opening a transmembrane ion channel upon binding of glutamate. Despite their crucial role in neurobiology, the architecture and atomic structure of an intact ionotropic glutamate receptor are unknown. Here we report the crystal structure of the alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionic acid (AMPA)-sensitive, homotetrameric, rat GluA2 receptor at 3.6 A resolution in complex with a competitive antagonist. The receptor harbours an overall axis of two-fold symmetry with the extracellular domains organized as pairs of local dimers and with the ion channel domain exhibiting four-fold symmetry. A symmetry mismatch between the extracellular and ion channel domains is mediated by two pairs of conformationally distinct subunits, A/C and B/D. Therefore, the stereochemical manner in which the A/C subunits are coupled to the ion channel gate is different from the B/D subunits. Guided by the GluA2 structure and site-directed cysteine mutagenesis, we suggest that GluN1 and GluN2A NMDA (N-methyl-d-aspartate) receptors have a similar architecture, with subunits arranged in a 1-2-1-2 pattern. We exploit the GluA2 structure to develop mechanisms of ion channel activation, desensitization and inhibition by non-competitive antagonists and pore blockers.


  • Organizational Affiliation

    Vollum Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, Oregon 97239, USA.


Macromolecules
Find similar proteins by:  (by identity cutoff)  |  3D Structure
Entity ID: 1
MoleculeChains Sequence LengthOrganismDetailsImage
Glutamate receptor 2
A, B
263Rattus norvegicusMutation(s): 1 
Gene Names: Glur2Gria2
Membrane Entity: Yes 
UniProt
Find proteins for P19491 (Rattus norvegicus)
Explore P19491 
Go to UniProtKB:  P19491
Entity Groups  
Sequence Clusters30% Identity50% Identity70% Identity90% Identity95% Identity100% Identity
UniProt GroupP19491
Sequence Annotations
Expand
  • Reference Sequence
Small Molecules
Ligands 4 Unique
IDChains Name / Formula / InChI Key2D Diagram3D Interactions
ZK1
Query on ZK1

Download Ideal Coordinates CCD File 
F [auth B]{[7-morpholin-4-yl-2,3-dioxo-6-(trifluoromethyl)-3,4-dihydroquinoxalin-1(2H)-yl]methyl}phosphonic acid
C14 H15 F3 N3 O6 P
WZMQMKNCWDCCMT-UHFFFAOYSA-N
LY7
Query on LY7

Download Ideal Coordinates CCD File 
E [auth A]N-[(2S)-2-(4'-cyanobiphenyl-4-yl)propyl]propane-2-sulfonamide
C19 H22 N2 O2 S
HOQAVGZLYRYHSO-OAHLLOKOSA-N
GLU
Query on GLU

Download Ideal Coordinates CCD File 
C [auth A]GLUTAMIC ACID
C5 H9 N O4
WHUUTDBJXJRKMK-VKHMYHEASA-N
SO4
Query on SO4

Download Ideal Coordinates CCD File 
D [auth A],
G [auth B]
SULFATE ION
O4 S
QAOWNCQODCNURD-UHFFFAOYSA-L
Experimental Data & Validation

Experimental Data

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 1.55 Å
  • R-Value Free: 0.224 
  • R-Value Work: 0.196 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.198 
  • Space Group: P 21 21 21
Unit Cell:
Length ( Å )Angle ( ˚ )
a = 66.657α = 90
b = 95.586β = 90
c = 97.047γ = 90
Software Package:
Software NamePurpose
REFMACrefinement

Structure Validation

View Full Validation Report



Ligand Structure Quality Assessment 


Entry History 

Deposition Data

Revision History  (Full details and data files)

  • Version 1.0: 2009-12-15
    Type: Initial release
  • Version 1.1: 2011-07-13
    Changes: Version format compliance
  • Version 1.2: 2017-08-16
    Changes: Source and taxonomy
  • Version 1.3: 2018-08-08
    Changes: Data collection, Database references
  • Version 1.4: 2021-10-13
    Changes: Database references, Derived calculations
  • Version 1.5: 2023-09-06
    Changes: Data collection, Refinement description